The liturgical season of Easter has begun. Lilies and tulips placed around the altar make it beautiful, but soon they will fade and be replaced by the green plants we usually see up here. And although the colors of our plants return to green, our liturgical color remains white—the color of Easter. Our burse and veil on the altar and my vestments continue to be white for this Sunday and for five more Sundays—during the 50 days of the Easter season. The 50th day will be Pentecost Sunday when the liturgical color becomes red symbolizing the coming of the Holy Spirit after Christ's return to God.
Except for the season after Pentecost, the Easter season lasts for more Sundays than the others. It represents the time Christ appeared to the people who had followed Jesus to prepare them for what God wanted them to do. First, they needed to understand what Christ's resurrection meant. Then, they had to be empowered to go out to proclaim the message of Jesus Christ to everyone who would listen.
Our readings for the season of Easter follow this pattern as well. The meaning of resurrection is explored. The Risen Christ's interactions with his disciples are recounted. Jesus's teaches his disciples about his relationship with them and with those who will come after, receiving faith in Jesus Christ from those who knew Jesus.
Fred Borsch, formerly Bishop of Los Angeles, and now a seminary professor, writes about the meaning of Jesus post-resurrection appearances: “These are, indeed, wondrous and challenging stories in which Jesus is at first often not recognized. But there must have been something in the timbre of his voice. They see his scars. They know him in the breaking of the bread—in the sharing of bread and wine. The Spirit of Jesus is alive among them! God's love overcomes even the mighty power of death. . . [Jesus] not only spoke the words of God to them, he himself is God's Word of new life to all people.”
So today we heard an account from the Gospel of John telling of the Risen Christ's appearance to some of Jesus' disciples—and especially to Thomas. This account must be one of the most famous of these post resurrection appearances—so famous, in fact, that any of us could preach on this passage without much preparation.
Our theme might be the nature of doubt—or Thomas as an “everyman,” a typical person—or the nature of faith: “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have come to believe.” Another theme might be the coming of the Holy Spirit to them through the breath of Jesus, and Jesus' sending the disciples out, “As the Father has sent me, so I send you.”—a sort of precursor of the coming of the Holy Spirit after Jesus' return to God in that very familiar account in the book of Acts we will hear this year and every single Pentecost Sunday. In fact, part of the gospel reading today will be the gospel reading for Pentecost Sunday two years from now.
And then there is that statement from Jesus about the forgiving or retaining of sins. Another theme then could be how we understand our responsibility as a Christian community to exercise the power in Christ's name to forgive sins. I understand our corporate confession of sin and the priest proclaiming God's forgiveness or absolution of sins in the midst of the assembly on most Sundays (but not in Easter) as flowing from this statement of the Risen Christ.
But of all the amazing themes that a preacher—or any one of us—can pull from this passage, a very powerful theme for these disciples and for us is the theme of our God coming twice—and if you take all the post-resurrection accounts in the New Testament—the theme of our God coming to the disciples as many times as they needed God to come until they understood and were ready to be sent out to spread the Good News. But not only to proclaim the victory of Jesus over sin and death, but also to agree, as Peter was asked by Jesus later in John's gospel, to feed and tend his sheep.
Thomas did not understand and was not ready. Jesus came back to provide what Thomas needed—affirmation of his right to question what he had been told by his fellow disciples. For some reason Thomas did not trust them enough to believe they had seen the resurrected Jesus. Jesus came back—but not just for Thomas.
Had the disciples been empowered enough to lose their fear and go out to spread the Good News? The fact that they were back at the house where they had been hiding out implies that the other disciples needed more encouragement. John reported that Jesus continued to do signs in the presence of his disciples that John did not record. For John the signs that he chose to report, beginning with changing water into wine at the wedding feast at Cana, revealed who Jesus truly was—the Messiah of God, although fully human, as well. As John wrote in the prologue to his gospel: “And the Word became flesh . . ."
Jesus didn't get angry with Thomas or the other disciples, because they needed to continue to learn from him. He stayed with them until he knew they were ready to become apostles—no longer students, but people ready to be sent out to preach, teach and heal. I find comfort in Jesus' readiness to reach out again and again to those less than perfect disciples—for I am so much like they were—I also have felt unready and anxious at times about what God may be calling me to do. But as an observer of how our Lord treated Thomas, I can worry less, knowing that God will reveal God's self to me as God knows I have need of such a revelation. Each of us can ask God for the assurance we need—as Thomas did—confident there will be revelation in a way we can understand, so “that through believing [in Jesus, we] may have life in his name.” And for this we can say, “Thanks be to God.”
Frederick Borsch, Introducing the Lessons of the Church Year 3rd Edition, New York: Morehouse Publishing, 2009, pp. 107-108.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Easter Day - God has acted!!
Psalm 118:
22-24:
“The same stone which the builders
rejected * has become the chief cornerstone.
This is the Lord’s
doing; * and it is marvelous in our eyes.
On this day that
the Lord has acted; *
let us rejoice and be glad in it.”
In the 12th chapter of his gospel
Mark puts verses 22 & 23 from Psalm 118 in Jesus' telling of the Parable of
the Wicked Tenants to the members of the religious establishment who were
questioning his authority. You know
the tale: A landlord plants a
vineyard, leaves for another country, and leases it to tenants. When he is ready to collect his portion
of the profits, he sends several servants who are murdered by the tenants so
they can keep the profits. Finally
the landlord sends his son, thinking that surely he will be treated with
respect. But the son is murdered
as well. Jesus then says the landlord will come and destroy the tenants and
give the vineyard to others. Jesus
cites this passage from Psalm 118 as proof of God's intentions. Needless to say, the religious
authorities became quite angry when they realized Jesus intended this parable
to describe them! They were angry
enough to think about arresting him.
Mark saw Jesus as the rejected stone who had
been set as the cornerstone for the new work of God, beginning with Jesus'
resurrection. Traditionally cornerstones are important, because it's the first stone set on the foundation in
the construction of a masonry building. All other stones will be set in reference to the cornerstone, thus determining
the position and soundness of the entire structure.
Of
course, once a good cornerstone is set on the foundation, the builder needs
more stones. Evidence in the
gospels tells us that among human beings there was little for God to work
with. During the days before
Jesus' crucifixion the crowds abandoned Jesus. The religious authorities delivered him to the Romans as a
serious trouble-maker. One of those with him for the supper on Thursday evening
betrayed him to the authorities. One had denied him publicly. Other followers
appear to have scattered, hiding out in fear. Yes, some women stayed with him
through the crucifixion, but on morning of the first day of the week they were
bringing spices to anoint his dead body.
It's clear they did not expect resurrection. And the cornerstone itself
seemed pretty much smashed, while the “living stones” God needed to begin building
were useless or missing.
The
final line of the gospel reading today illustrates an profound absence in
understanding God's plan of salvation in Jesus: “So [the women] went out and
fled from the tomb; for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said
nothing to anyone for they were afraid.”
Isn't there more to this gospel?
Most scholars believe additional verses were added to Mark's gospel,
because of early Christians' discomfort with ending the gospel on a note of
fear. But if Mark wanted to lengthen
his story he could have done so.
But the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of Mark stop just where
we stopped today.
Although,
as a practical matter, the community for whom Mark’s gospel was written—decades
after the events of Easter morning—knew and believed the story of the empty
tomb and Jesus' resurrection, I'd like to stay for a bit with the empty tomb
and the frightened fleeing women.
Evidence of his resurrection was clear: stone rolled away, tomb empty
and a young man in white announcing, “He has been raised, he is not here.” But
no one was prepared to understand the evidence. This moment of is characterized by emptiness—absence of
Jesus at that moment and absence of the folks who understand the Good
News: Jesus' sacrificed himself
out of love for us to defeat the power of evil and death. And he triumphed!
We
sometimes talk about how we must be God's hands and feet in the world to do the
work needed to bring reconciliation and peace. The Great Commission from the Gospel of Matthew says, “. .
.go and make disciples of all nations . . .baptizing. . .teaching . . .” At the end of the gospel of Luke,
Jesus says for the disciples to wait until they have received “power from on
high,” but he also told them that “repentance and forgiveness of sins is to be
proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning in Jerusalem.” But at the end of Mark there seems to
be just emptiness and absence and fear.
Yet,
the way Mark's gospel ends highlights the power of God to transform even the
most desperate of situations. Perhaps we have experienced times when we felt
empty and fearful. We can
empathize with the women who fled, being overwhelmed and not being able to
receive whatever might help us—most of us have been there, too.
But
then we will have Easter moments--just as the women eventually did (although
Mark doesn't tell us about them)!
Our Easter moments have been—and will continue to be—times when our
distress and emptiness and fear are filled and transformed by the presence of
God. The “cornerstone” of our
lives has been set in place—Jesus Christ lives! We are now ready to respond as “living stones,” allowing God
to place us in proper orientation around our cornerstone, Jesus. Having experienced the filling of our
emptiness, the calming of our distress and replacement of our fear with
peace—for the moment at least—we can hear and respond to God's call to live
righteous lives, fit for God's kingdom, and to bear witness to his love among
all people.
So
on this Easter Day let us declare with the psalmist:
“The same stone which the
builders rejected * has become the chief cornerstone.
This
is the Lord’s doing; * and it is marvelous in our eyes.
On
this day that the Lord has
acted; * let us rejoice and be glad in it.”
Friday, April 6, 2012
Good Friday - Following Jesus' Example
One gospel hymn has us loudly and rhythmically singing, “ I
have decided to follow Jesus; I have decided to follow Jesus, I have decided to
follow Jesus; no turning back, no turning back.” Well, if there is any day of Jesus' life that
we might choose to turn back from, the Friday we call “good” would be it. Following a man about to be crucified appears
to be the height of foolishness.
Following a man whose followers mostly have disappeared from the scene
and are hiding out for fear of their lives seems to be unwise. Yet now, because we know Jesus' crucifixion
on Friday was not the end, we do sing loudly about following him.
What are our dark Gethsemanes? What must we do before we are gathered in God's sustaining presence where we become one with God, encompassed in divine love? Watch, stay present with God, ask to be given insight into the divine will for your life: “learn from Jesus Christ to pray.”
“See him at the judgment hall, beaten, bound, reviled,
arraigned; O the wormwood and the gall! O the pangs his soul sustained! Shun
not suffering, shame, or loss; learn of Christ to bear the cross.”
Is there any pain
like my pain? Is there any suffering
like my suffering? Probably yes; and
probably greater even than yours. These
are not pastoral words of comfort.
Indeed, false comfort makes suffering worse. Should suffering be escaped
whenever possible? Oh, yes! Do not seek
martyrdom. Should we relieve pain
whenever we have the capability to do so?
Most certainly! Yet our bodies are mortal; they decay; and pain
comes. Our spirits can endure only so
much, and they may fail us as well. Unmerited suffering, an attack by someone
we called a friend or loved one, loss of what has given our life meaning—many
times these place themselves in our path and the path looks too narrow to avoid
them. We may try to fight the
unfairness, the betrayal and the shame, but if we lose—and in this life, often
we may lose—what is left for us to do?
We can curse God, or we can call on God to stand with us in our
suffering: “learn of Christ to bear the cross.”
But what does “following Jesus” mean? When we follow, we can learn from his
example. One of our Holy Week hymns
addresses what we can learn from Jesus.
Using the verses of this hymn, let's reflect on what Jesus' example
during his final days teaches us.
“Go to dark Gethsemane, ye that feel the tempter's power; your
Redeemer's conflict see, watch with him one bitter hour. Turn not from his
griefs away; learn of Jesus Christ to pray.”
What does
temptation mean in a time of darkness?
Give into the darkness or escape it?
Perhaps both—maybe one, then the other.
To rage in anger at what life has dealt. To scream that this intolerable
situation must change now!! But Jesus'
conflict had a different quality. His words suggested a conversation with the
Divine from whom he had come: “If it is
possible—could there be any other way out—could sin, evil and death be
conquered some other way? “ And then hearing none, he prayed as his mother,
Mary, had prayed at the Annunciation—your will, O Divine One, be done.
What are our dark Gethsemanes? What must we do before we are gathered in God's sustaining presence where we become one with God, encompassed in divine love? Watch, stay present with God, ask to be given insight into the divine will for your life: “learn from Jesus Christ to pray.”
“Calvary's mournful
mountain climb; there, adoring at his feet, mark that miracle of time, God's
own sacrifice complete. 'It is finished!' hear him cry; learn of
Jesus Christ to die.”
Not all the
disciples of Jesus fled and hid in fear.
John's gospel tells us at the foot of Jesus' cross were “his mother, and
his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene.” Here I must take issue with the writer of
this hymn text—I don't believe these women felt 'adoration.' The sacrifice of Jesus' life on the cross to
the power of evil, sin and death could only be described as horrific. And yet,
and yet . . . will we, recognizing the transforming power of God to turn this
horror into blessing, falling on our knees in adoration? When Jesus said, 'It is finished,' he offered
all that he was and all that he had suffered to the transforming power of
divine love. When we place our faith in
God's power, in the end, finally to turn whatever has caused our suffering and
pain into eternal glory and eternal joy in the divine presence, we can do no
more: “learn of Jesus Christ to die.”
May God comfort you in your praying; may God strengthen you for
the crosses you must bear and, finally, may God redeem and transform your dying
as God did for God's self in Jesus Christ, our Savior. Amen.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Palm Sunday - Jesus' passion shows us love
“Jesus' passion teaches us what love looks like.” I put a check mark next to this
sentence in the commentary I was reading.
I did this to indicate how important the sentence is for understanding
the last days of Jesus' life prior to his death and resurrection.
The word “passion” used to describe Jesus' condition at the end of
his life calls attention to his suffering. This word has so many different shades of meaning in
English. But its Greek
root,”pathos,” means suffering.
So how can suffering teach us what love looks like? What does Jesus' suffering mean for
us? Perhaps we should begin by
saying what it does not mean.
Jesus' suffering does not mean that God made him a scapegoat on our
behalf. That point of view suggests
that God only could forgive our sins if someone who was much better than we
are—without sin—agreed to die in our place. Our sins should have condemned us
to eternal suffering. Yet, God's anger at our sinfulness could be placated by
Jesus' suffering and dying in our place. This is NOT why Jesus chose to suffer!
But how should we understand his suffering? First, his suffering grew out of his
Incarnation. Jesus took our human
nature upon himself. As the church
had believed since very early times, Jesus was fully divine AND fully human,
although without sin. He chose
this path out of love for us, so he could fully understand what being human
really means. Theologians call
this human finitude: Jesus lived in solidarity with us, especially with our limitations,
including our suffering. That why
we pray when we—or someone we love—is suffering for Jesus to be with them, to
strengthen, to comfort, and to sustain them.
Also, Jesus' manner of suffering showed us how to face the fear of
what evil and sin might do to us.
In the garden of Gethsemane, Jesus spoke to God from whom he had
come: “Abba, Father, for you all
things are possible; remove this cup from me; yet not what I want, but what you
want.” To finish what he had come
to do—to defeat the power of death, to give us the possibility of eternal
life—Jesus had to continue on the path to his arrest and crucifixion. To his
sleeping disciples, who could not stay awake to pray with him, he said, “The
hour has come; the Son of Man is betrayed into the hands of sinners.”
Perhaps when our times of challenge
come, we would rather follow Peter and, out of fear, deny who we truly are—who God
has called us to be. On the other
hand Jesus' example can lead us resist injustice without resorting to violence
and to become advocates for people in need—the least among us in our society's
eyes. April 4, Wednesday of this
week, is the anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King. He worked to confront racism and to
overturn the laws and practices in our country that kept African-Americans from
full participation in our society. This is the sort of love that Jesus' passion
teaches us.
And finally, Jesus' passion showed how God's love can break through
the wall of our separation from God. Feeling abandoned, as we often do in our
suffering, Jesus cried out, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” God's
answer to that cry was to reveal God's self. As Jesus cried out and breathed his last, the curtain of the
Temple, which closed off the holiest space in the Temple, was torn from top to
bottom. As Jesus' passion came to
an end, God's love reached across the chasm of our sinfulness and through the
curtain of our attempts to deny God's love for us—our attempts to shut God away. Reconciliation—God's reaching out to us
with divine grace as we suffer the effects of our sin and that of others—that's
what love looks like in the end!
Yes, Jesus' passion teaches us what love looks like. Love looks like standing in solidarity
with those who suffer. Love looks
like standing up to injustice, despite the fear one might feel, and never
resorting to violence. Love looks
like reaching out in forgiveness to offer reconciliation. And yes, the love Jesus' passion
teaches us can come at a steep cost.
It cost him his life. Are
we able to bear such a cost? Are
we able to bear our cross?
Thursday, March 29, 2012
The 5th Sunday of Lent - Conflict and Transformation
First comes the downside of change: “How many Episcopalians does it take to change a light
bulb? Three: One to call the electrician; one to
pour the drinks; and one who says, 'Change [horrified tone], change . . . no . . . don't you know that my
great-grandfather gave the church that light bulb?'”
Is there an upside? Br.
Mark Brown, a member of the Society of St. John the Evangelist (an Episcopalian
monastic order) posted this observation about change in a daily e-mail sent by
SSJE called, “Brother, give us a word.”
He entitled his posting “Tradition.” This is what he wrote:
“The Church, the Body of Christ, is essentially progressive. Rooted in the past, grounded in the
Eternal, but always renewing, always renovating.” How positive does that sound to you?
I've spent all of last week—32 hours of sitting, listening, and role
playing—attempting to understand and to learn how to deal with conflict using
mediation skills—skills rooted in family systems theory. This class, offered by the Lombard
Mennonite Peace Center, took place at Grace Church on Concord Pike.
Both resisting change or renewal and promoting change or
renewal often lead to conflict in the church—think Protestant Reformation. However, according to the curriculum
for my week of study, conflict should be approached as positive for the
church. Why? Because conflict,
properly handled, can become of a time of transformation—and because conflict
has always been a part of the life of the church—think of the conflict between
Peter and Paul about the full inclusion of Gentile Christians without their
having to obey the laws contained in Torah (the first five books of our Old
Testament).
So if conflict is a normal and expected part of the life of the
church, how can it become something positive when it feels so
uncomfortable? Because, the
Mennonite Peace Center claims, properly handled conflict can result in positive
transformation.
Positive transformation can be seen clearly in two of our readings
today. In the reading from
Jeremiah God declares divine action will transform humanity's relationship with
God. No longer will God's covenant
with them be external, written on stone tablets, but “I will put my law within
them and I will write it on their hearts . . . for they shall all know me, from
the least of them to the greatest. . .”
Torah, the law or instruction about how to live, had been difficult to
understand and keep. Now God,
through Jeremiah's prophecy, announced a transformed relationship with God's
people.
Knowing God—the path to a close relationship with God's self—would
be placed within every one of God's people. And the result of that new
covenant was forgiveness of sins—what we call “grace”—God was no longer
condemning human beings for our sins.
God had acted to transform our resistance to accepting God's will—to
transform our conflict with God's way—into a new relationship. Indeed, that's what the Mennonite Peace
Center maintains can happen when we face conflict honestly and we open our
hearts to God's transforming love and power. Our instructor called this “being hard on issues and soft on
people.”
“Soft on people” means being able to make statements of regret to
someone with whom you have been in conflict and to accept statements of regret
from them. Then after this
exchange both people should be able move on without continuing to hold a grudge
about the conflict. God's
assurance of “softness” toward humanity, given through Jeremiah's prophecy
said, “for I will forgive their iniquity and remember their sin no more.” Can we open our hearts to this
assurance? Can we listen carefully
and offer the same assurance when someone expresses regret to us?
Positive transformation can also be found in the reading from John's
gospel. Jesus uses a mini parable
to explain the transformation that will happen through his death and
resurrection. He said: “Very truly
I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains
just a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit.” But the image of a single, dormant
grain becoming an abundance of wheat surely applies to our lives. Jesus calls it “hating” one's life in
this world.
“Hating” is such a strong term—but like the grain we have to give up
our lives as they are and allow ourselves to be transformed in the
fertile ground of God's love and forgiveness. But doesn't this happen when we are baptized, and we are
never the same again? True enough,
but we continue to have free will and we continue to make choices that can push
us away from God. Reacting to a
conflict with another person by allowing our pain to fester will indeed push us
away from God.
Through expressing ourselves with a humble and generous spirit, we
can “be soft” both on ourselves and on anyone with whom we have a conflict. This attitude will allow God to
transform us and transform the situation in positive ways. Even in role-plays
this week we witnessed God's spirit moving as the person in the role of the
mediator coached and encouraged the two people in the role of disputants to
find common ground and move past the conflict they had.
As the church—as the Body of Christ—we have a vocation to seek
renewal through our openness to the transforming power of God. Whether we experience God through a
heart on which God has written or as the fertile soil that will give us new
life, we can find ourselves renewed.
So we need not fear change.
We need not fear ending conflict by making peace with someone else in
the Body of Christ. For as Br. Mark explained, “The Church, the Body of Christ,
is essentially progressive. Rooted
in the past, grounded in the Eternal, but always renewing, always
renovating.” So as members of the
Body of Christ, let us be renewed!
Sunday, March 18, 2012
The 4th Sunday of Lent - Accepting Unconditional Love?
To discern the will of God—to know the mind of God: these phrases express what all who
wrote holy scripture, all who read that scripture, all who pray to God, all who
worship God seek. Luke Timothy
Johnson, the theologian and scholar, on one of the videos from our Lenten
series used a phrase to describe those who wrote what has become accepted as
holy scripture this way: “intoxicated with God.”
Most, if not all of us, have either been intoxicated at least once
or been with someone who was intoxicated.
This is not such a positive image—in fact, I would call it a negative
image. But I think Professor
Johnson is asking us to view “intoxication” in a different way—as being
completely overtaken by, completely filled with an awareness of God's presence
in one's life and the life of the world.
So each recounting of the history of God's chosen people, each
prophecy, each story from the life of Jesus, each letter to the early church
with admonitions and theological teaching flows from a state of intoxication
with God. This does not mean that
scripture is untrustworthy; rather, it means scripture comes from the hearts
and minds of people whose lives have been caught up fully in the divine life of
God.
In this divinely “intoxicated” writing, we find many themes. Two primary ones are: God who judges
those who stray from the path of righteousness and God who saves by God's
grace and mercy—unmerited grace and mercy—grace and mercy we have done nothing
AND can do nothing to earn. When
we allow ourselves to be open to the experience God's grace and mercy, we find
ourselves called to respond by suspending our tendency to judge and by
sharing God's compassion. In doing
these things we allow God's grace to be manifest in our lives.
I want to
share a story with you. It comes from a sermon published online on a website
called Day One. The preacher is a
Lutheran pastor and seminary professor, Dr. David Lose. He wrote: “Tom, a member of our congregation,
told me a story. Several nights earlier, Tom's six year-old son, Benjamin,
protested his bedtime. Frustrated by his father's refusal to budge, Benjamin
finally became so frustrated that he said, "Daddy, I hate you!" Tom,
possessing the presence of mind I wish I more frequently had--especially when
dealing with my children--replied, "I'm sorry you feel that way, Ben, but
I love you." And then what do you think Benjamin said? "Oh, it's
okay." Or maybe, "Sorry, Dad. I love you, too." Nope. When Tom
told his son that he loved him, Benjamin yelled back, "Don't say
that!" Surprised, Tom continued, "But, Ben, but it's true--I love
you." "Don't say that, Daddy." "But I love you, Ben."
"Stop saying that, Daddy! Stop saying it right now!" And then it came,
Tom reported, almost completely unbidden: "Benjamin, now listen to me: I
love you...like it or not!"
Dr. Lose
continued: “Even at six years old, you see, Benjamin realized that in the face
of unconditional love he was powerless. If Tom had been willing to
negotiate--"I'll love you if you go to bed nicely"—then
Benjamin would have been a player: "Okay, this time, but I'm not eating my
vegetables at dinner tomorrow." But once Tom refused to negotiate, refused
to make his love for his son conditional on something Benjamin did, then Ben could
do nothing but accept or flee that love.”
Yes, that
is our choice, too: once we have glimpsed God's love, we can accept God's love
or we can flee away. Those
God-intoxicated folks who wrote down their experiences of God, which we read in
holy scripture, may have felt like fleeing at times, too. But in the end they chose to accept
God's love and grace. The psalmist
[Psalm 139: 7-12] expressed this well:
“Where can I go from your spirit?
Or where can I flee from your presence?
If I ascend to
heaven, you are there; if I make my bed in Sheol, you are there.
If I take the wings
of the morning and settle at the farthest limits of the sea,
even there your hand
shall lead me, and your right hand shall hold me fast.
If I say, “Surely
the darkness shall cover me, and the light around me become night,
even the darkness is
not dark to you; the night is as bright as the day, for darkness is as light to
you.”
In the scripture passages we read during Lent,
we usually find a theme of God's judgment in them. Lent should be a time for us to reflect on where we have
fallen short of living as people fully responding to God's grace. But dwelling only on our sinfulness—or
the sinfulness of others—cuts off the full picture. The full picture of God's loving grace appears again and
again in holy scripture. It may be
enacted—as when Jesus and his disciples fed the multitude of hungry people
with five loaves and two fish. Or
it may be explained—as in the Gospel of John [3:21] with these words: “But
those who do what is true come to the light, so that it may be clearly seen
that their deeds have been done in God.”
To discern the will of God—to know the mind of
God: let us use this holy season of Lent to read holy scripture, to pray to
God, and to listen for God both alone and in our faith community of St.
Nicholas'. May we use
this time not only to recognize our sinfulness and ask for forgiveness; but may
we use this time to allow ourselves to accept God's grace. Then through our deeds—within our
families, within the life of our faith community, and within the life of the
world, may God's grace bring healing and peace.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
The 3rd Sunday of Lent - Faith and Commandments
A Lutheran pastor and a Jewish rabbi had been eating lunch at a cafe. Now they were saying
good-bye to each other. “Keep the
faith,” the pastor said as the two friends parted. The rabbi responded, “Keep the commandments.” This little story reflects what some
see as the two principal aspects of religion: what we believe in and how we
will live.
At any particular moment we may emphasize one over the other. Martin Luther saw the writings of St.
Paul, particularly in his letter to the Romans, as saying that salvation comes
to us from God by grace through our faith. On the other hand, in his epistle, James emphasizes the
importance of how we choose to live.
In the second chapter James wrote: “What good is it, my brothers and
sisters, if you say you have faith, but do not have works?” He continues by describing how we
should help those in need and by declaring that faith without works is
“dead.” He challenges those who
would disagree, “Show me your faith apart from your works, and I by my works
will show you my faith.” So could
keeping the commandments and keeping the faith really refer to the same thing?
So let's look at how God's commandments can be understood in the
context of our faith and how our faith can be understood in the context of
God's commandments. One scholar
commenting on the passage we heard from Exodus call it “a gift, an opportunity
to grow deeper in relationship with God in Christ.” He goes on to say that these commandments—God's words—help
us reflect on how we “fall short of Christ-likeness” and also give us “a
roadmap of faith”—could we say a GPS of faith? Our faith in God as our GPS—what an interesting image! What destination should we type
in? Heaven? God? Will our faith guide us to God by telling us how to get
there—by describing what we must do to get to God? But the brains of the GPS—the processing unit, if you
will—would be God's words—the Ten Words—the Ten Commandments. So when we come to an intersection, a
choice point, the commandments will guide us into making a faithful choice,
leading us closer and closer to God.
Here is another perspective of how faith and the law are
intertwined. In Psalm 19's hymn to the law, we see the law as foundational for
faith in God. The English
translation of verses 7 through 9 by the International Consultation on English
in the Liturgy makes this obvious:
God's
perfect law revives the soul.
God's
stable rule guides the simple.
God's
just demands delight the heart.
God's
clear commands sharpen vision.
God's
fautless decrees stand forever.
God's
right judgments keep their truth.
We
can understand God better and our faith will be supported by hearing how God
wants us to live. The theologian Walter Brueggemann wrote: “These commands might be taken not as a
series of rules, but as a proclamation in God's own mouth of who God is and how
God shall be 'practiced' by this community of liberated slaves.”
So the
“practicing of God” as a way of faith: In the Gospel reading this morning we heard that when
Jesus' disciples saw him drive the animal sellers out of the temple and
overturn the table of the money changers, they “remembered that it was written,
'Zeal for your house will consume me.'”
Jesus' consuming zeal that God's house should be holy place, not a
market place, appeared to be placing faith in God—not the purity practices of
no blemished animals and no Roman money—at the center of the most holy spot for
Judaism.
Jesus'
zealousness for keeping practices in the Temple faithful to God was carried one
step further by his teaching about believing in God's power. He prophesied: “Destroy this temple and
in three days I will raise it up.” God’s power to redeem what humanity seeks to
destroy becomes the sign that Jesus is God's Messiah and our Savior. The disciples' faith then (and our
faith now) has become strengthened through Jesus' zealous words and
actions. For Jesus knew the law: “
. . .you shall have no other gods before me . . . You shall not make for
yourself an idol . . .” No
correct coins, no unblemished animals, no pile of stones is more important than
a relationship with the living God.
The gift
of the law God gave to the recently freed Hebrew slaves at Mt. Sinai to
strengthen their faith and bring them closer to God's self became the gift
Jesus gave to his disciples, to the people coming to worship in the temple that
day, and finally to us. Jesus'
gift was to show us God's commandments, faithfully practiced, should free us
from fear.
Because our efforts to keep God's commandments, successful or not,
should lead us closer to knowing God, thereby strengthening our faith.
The monk
Thomas Merton expressed this thought in a prayer with great eloquence. You may have heard his prayer before,
but let me share it now:
O Lord God,
I have no idea where I am going,
I do not see the road ahead of me,
I cannot know for certain where it will end.
Nor do I really know myself,
And the fact that I think
I am following Your will
Does not mean that I am actually doing so.
But I believe
That the desire to please You
Does in fact please You.
And I hope I have that desire
In all that I am doing.
I hope that I will never do anything
Apart from that desire to please You.
And I know that if I do this
You will lead me by the right road,
Though I may know nothing about it.
Therefore I will trust You always
Though I may seem to be lost
And in the shadow of death.
I will not fear,
For You are ever with me,
And You will never leave me
To make my journey alone.
I have no idea where I am going,
I do not see the road ahead of me,
I cannot know for certain where it will end.
Nor do I really know myself,
And the fact that I think
I am following Your will
Does not mean that I am actually doing so.
But I believe
That the desire to please You
Does in fact please You.
And I hope I have that desire
In all that I am doing.
I hope that I will never do anything
Apart from that desire to please You.
And I know that if I do this
You will lead me by the right road,
Though I may know nothing about it.
Therefore I will trust You always
Though I may seem to be lost
And in the shadow of death.
I will not fear,
For You are ever with me,
And You will never leave me
To make my journey alone.
So let’s
go back to that cafe I spoke about in the beginning. Were we present that day in the cafe and sitting close
enough to hear the Lutheran pastor and the Jewish rabbi bid each other
farewell, we might quietly say to God, “I offer you myself as I seek to keep
the faith, and seek to keep the commandments.”
Except
for the Merton prayer, quotes in this sermon were taken from commentary for the
Third Sunday in Lent, Feasting on the Word, Year B, Vol 2., edited by D.
L. Bartlett & B. B. Taylor, p 74-97.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)