In Time magazine this week, one of the long articles
discussed a currently popular theory of parenting called “attachment
parenting.” A physician and his wife, Dr. Bill and Martha Sears have raised
eight children, including one with Down syndrome and one adopted child. They have written a book about
“attachment parenting” that promotes raising children in a way to maximize a
parent's (usually a mother's) time and physical contact with a child and to
meet an infant's needs in such a way as to minimize his or her crying.
Attachment theory has a much longer history than this book, of
course. In the latter half of the
20th century psychologists conducted carefully designed studies and
found what they described as different patterns of attachments in toddlers.
These patterns included “secure” attachment and various forms of “anxious” attachment between the
primary caregiver and the child.
According to specialists in human development, parents should care about
the quality of their attachment to their children, because it may strongly
affect the child's sense of self and how the child carries out relationships
with others.
Having become Jacob's grandmother about 10 months ago, I have been
both participant and observer in activities designed to promote
attachment. As all of you know who
have been caretakers of children, even for brief periods, attachment behavior
comes not only from the caregiver to the child, but also from the child toward
the caregiver. Ethologists claim
that animals, including humans, are biologically programmed to seek proximity
with caregivers. This past week I
heard a wonderful story about a daughter of the rector of St. James, Millcreek,
in the early part of the 20th century. On the way to church, she rescued a baby hawk that had
fallen from the nest and placed it under her hat. She thought no one had seen her, so she simply kept her hat
on all day. Finally, later in the
day, her mother demanded she take off the hat and let the bird out. The hawk, despite being released,
appeared to have become “attached” to her. The hawk behaved as a “pet” by
continuing to interact with her out-of-doors.
When we hear readings from scripture talking about “abiding in love”
and “loving one another” within the community of Jesus' and his disciples, we
can learn something about the ideal of divine-human attachment and the
human to human attachment that flows from it. Attachment means nothing unless is becomes operational. Attachment gains its power from the
interactions that occur in the relationship between the person who seeks
attachment and the person who is sought.
Our scripture tells us God's love for us becomes operational in God's choosing us, in God's taking on our flesh in Jesus, and God's offering God's self in Jesus to defeat the power of evil and death. God's love does not arise from a feeling, but from the will to act in a way that puts our well-being first. Our love for each other should contain the same character of selflessness as God's love for us does.
Jesus told his disciples, “If you keep my commandments, you will
abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide in his
love. . . .You did not choose me, I chose you. And I appointed you to go and
bear fruit, fruit that will last. . .”
The Greek verb for “last” as in “fruit that will last” is the same as
the Greek verb for “abide.” The attachment that Jesus describes—abiding in
him—can only be made real if it is through love—with love as its fruit.
Julian of Norwich [a town in England] was a nun who lived in the
latter half of the 14th century in a cell attached to the church
there. When she was thirty, she became gravely ill, nearly dying. During a period of several days, she
had a number of visions of Jesus—both visual and aural. She spent the rest of her life
pondering the meaning of the visions and wrote a book about what she had come
to understand. It has been entitled, “Revelations of Divine Love.”
Julian believed God wants to be attached to us just as good parents
and loving family members may be attached to us. In Chapter 58 she wrote: “In our making, God, Almighty, is
our Nature’s Father; and God, All-Wisdom, is our Nature’s Mother; with the Love
and the Goodness of the Holy Ghost: which is all one God, one Lord. And in the
knitting and the oneing He is our Very, True Spouse, and we His loved Wife, His
Fair Maiden: with which Wife He is never displeased. For He saith: I love thee
and thou lovest me, and our love shall never be disparted in two.”
She concludes
her book with these reflections: “From that time that it was shewed I desired
oftentimes to learn what was our Lord’s meaning. And fifteen years after, and
more, I was answered in ghostly [spiritual] understanding, saying thus: Wouldst
thou learn thy Lord’s meaning in this thing? Learn it well: Love was
His meaning. Who shewed it
thee?Love. What shewed He
thee? Love. Wherefore
shewed it He? For Love.
Hold thee therein and thou shalt learn and know more in the same. But thou
shalt never know nor learn therein other thing without end. Thus was I learned that Love was our Lord’s
meaning.”
On this Mother's Day Sunday we would do well to look
to Julian's broad understanding of God as being both Mother and Father—and
loving Spouse! What should our
response to this idealization of human attachments as a way of understanding
God? None of us—not even Dr. Bill and Martha Sears—can approach the deep and
authentic attachment in divine love that God offers us. We are bid to abide in God's love
and—this is the really difficult part—to show that same sort of love in our
relationships with others: to care deeply about their well-being, to act toward
everyone we encounter in our lives as people worthy of our respect.
Does this remind
us of the final questions of our Baptismal Covenant: “Will you seek and serve
Christ in all persons, loving your neighbor as yourself? Will you strive for justice and
peace and respect the dignity of every human being?” Together, quietly, but strongly, let us accept God's
invitation to abide in the divine love and show this sort of love in all our
relationships. Our answer to these questions is, of course, “ I will, with
God's help.”
No comments:
Post a Comment